[Bug 199592] Review Request: icu4j

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 14 15:36:15 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: icu4j


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592


vivekl at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|vivekl at redhat.com           |mwringe at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From vivekl at redhat.com  2007-02-14 10:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > ...
> >  - for non-numerics (pre-release, CVS snapshots, etc.), see
> >    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageRelease
> >    . 0:3.4.5-2jpp.1 -> 0:3.4.5-2jpp.2%{?dist} to be inline with 
> >      http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ExceptionJPackage
Looks good, 0:3.4.5-2jpp.1.fc7 is rpm newer 
> >  ...
> > X * license field matches the actual license.
> >    + The license according
> >      http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/icu/license.jsp is X License
> Yeah, the X License = X.net License = X11 License = MIT License
> Only the MIT license and the X.net License appear in the offical rpmlint
> license list. Should this be called what the project calls it "X license"
> or should the MIT license be used instead since rpmlint likes it better?
> 
MIT style seems correct to me for this package


> > W: icu4j-eclipse no-documentation
> >  . There should probably be an EPL file in the eclipse subpackage that needs
> >    to be added
> The plugin should be under the X license since this is the license of the
> project. This has now been added
OK

> > X package should own all directories and files
> >   . /usr/lib/eclipse should be owned by libswt3-gtk2 in the latest update to it,
Please apply bkonrath's suggestion above

> > add a require for it
> >   . jpackage-utils is needed for the javadoc and base package since it needs
> > /usr/share/java{,doc}.

Also please apply the fix to the src.zip that bkonrath mentioned
Everything else looks good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list