[Bug 221884] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 18 11:00:37 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884


bjohnson at symetrix.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |163776, 177841
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-02-18 06:00 EST -------
It appears that this bug was /somewhat/ fixed, but perhaps not in the way I
expected.

http://projects.sucs.org/projects/pybackpack/ticket/36

It *is* much faster now, but when I exclude a directory like ~/xbuild, it still
walks the tree, even if I excluded that directory from the backup set.  Why? 
What use is that if we are not going to backup those files?

Also, if there are any unreadable files/directories, the backup will terminate.
 It should just continue, but with a warning that those files could not be
backed up.

Sun Feb 18 03:34:44 2007: Starting backup of 'home-terastation' to
'/net/terastation/mnt/array1/backup/pybackpack'
Sun Feb 18 03:34:44 2007: Analysing backup source
Sun Feb 18 03:38:48 2007: Permissions/file missing problems on certain files:
Directory: /home/bjohnson/.lightscribe
Sun Feb 18 03:38:48 2007: Backup failed.

Setting your FE-NEEDSPONSOR and FE-NEW blockers so the right people can find you ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list