[Bug 247775] Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 11 17:13:38 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: naturette - An AGI adventure game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247775
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-11 13:13 EST -------
Builds OK, installs and plays fine. rpmlint says:
E: naturette zero-length /usr/share/naturette/snddir
which is normal for AGI games which don't include sound.
* source files manually compared with upstream.
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is acceptable for content.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
naturette = 1.3-1.fc8
=
/bin/bash
/bin/sh
hicolor-icon-theme
nagi
* %check is not present; no upstream test suite. Seems fine with manual
testing.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* desktop file looks OK and installs without errors.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list