[Bug 233602] Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 14 00:13:30 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pykdeextentions - A collection of python packages to support KDE applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233602
dev at nigelj.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com 2007-07-13 20:13 EST -------
Package name: PASS (pykdeextensions)
License: PASS (LGPL)
Spec Legible: PASS (en_US)
md5sum matches: PASS (5249c7288c1b2bed44a2d91111d3313a)
rpmlint clean: NOTES
Builds correctly: PASS (i386)
RPaths removed: PASS
Spec has %clean: PASS
Macro use consistant: PASS
Contains code/content: PASS
-doc subpackage: NA
-devel subpackage: PASS
-static subpackage: NA
pkgconfig depend: NA
Contains %doc: PASS
Library suffix: NA
No .la files: NA
Use desktop-file-install: NA
No duplicate ownerships: PASS
rm -rf %{buildroot}: PASS
RPM uses valid UTF-8: PASS
%defattr is set: PASS
No duplicate %files: PASS
Not relocatable: PASS
Calls ldconfig: PASS
Supports Locales: NA
BR's are correct: PASS
NA - Not Applicable
NT - Not Tested
rpmlint on build RPMS:
E: pykdeextensions non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/qtuicompiler.py 0644
E: pykdeextensions non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/kdedistutils.py 0644
E: pykdeextensions-devel non-executable-script
/usr/share/apps/pykdeextensions/app_templates/kdeapp/src/prefdialog.py 0644
I'm assuming these scripts are meant to be non-executable, so APPROVED
Oh, and If you do need a comaintainer, let me know.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list