[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hylafax


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-07-17 15:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #55)
> [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/hylafax-5.1.6-1.src.rpm
> E: hylafax configure-without-libdir-spec
> 
> HylaFAX's configure is not a direct derivative from the autoconf versions, and
> thus there is no --libdir= option for HylaFAX's configure.

Correct, ignore the warning.

> [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint
> /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/hylafax-5.1.6-1.x86_64.rpm | sort
> E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax
> E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax
> E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax

Safe to ignore as I already said in comment #12

> E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600

Ignore, see comment #12

> E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700
> E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700
> E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700
> E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700
> E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700
> E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700

Ignore

> E: hylafax script-without-shebang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux
> 
> This file, faxsetup.linux, is a shell script stub.  It is included (via ".")
> from the invoked faxsetup script.

Ok, ignore.

> W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps
> 
> While it is true that the example coversheet is not itself a configuration file,
> it is meant to be configured - i.e. replaced, and it belongs there.

Ok.

> [root at dhcp006 SPECS]# rpmlint hylafax | sort
> W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.1.6
> /lib64/libm.so.6
> W: hylafax unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfaxutil.so.5.1.6
> /lib64/libm.so.6
> 
> These two are particularly curious to me, and I cannot figure them out. 

ldd -r -u /usr/lib64/libfaxserver.so.5.0.4
-- snipped _lots_ of undefined symbols --
Unused direct dependencies:
        /usr/lib64/libjpeg.so.62
        /lib64/libz.so.1
        /lib64/libcrypt.so.1
        /lib64/libutil.so.1
        /lib64/libm.so.6

I haven't looked at this deeper yet, it is not necessarily a blocker, see
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-June/msg00176.html

Could you please take a look at the undefined symbols again? As there are no
major blockers you can submit a new srpm for review.

Hope we aren't getting any SELinux troubles. What Fedora Version are you running
with hylafax? Do you have SELinux enabled?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.