[Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 20 09:43:08 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248996
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-07-20 05:42 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs.
+ source files match upstream.
f325b7dd9f273c46e77fb7b337325880 libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
- dist tag is NOT present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc files are present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ shared libraries scriptlet used.
+ Provides: synce_plugin.so
+ Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
+ Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libglib-2.0.so.0 libopensync.so.0
librapi.so.2 librra.so.0 libsynce.so.0 libxml2.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH)
+Not a GUI App.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list