[Bug 248858] Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 20 12:13:19 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cupsddk - CUPS Driver Development Kit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248858


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-07-20 08:13 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for RPMs.
But not silent for SRPM. Got following errors
E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib,
/usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.

E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/filter/*
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib,
/usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.

E: cupsddk hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/cups/driver/*
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib,
/usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.

But above is false for our installation locations/paths. So I think above is
ignorable.
+ source files match upstream.
d35b74cbfaa4c48b0d650c34249bab6d  cupsddk-1.2.0-source.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc files are present.
+ -devel and -drivers subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets used.
+ cupsddk-1.2.0-3.fc8 requires 
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1
libcups.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ cupsddk-devel-1.2.0-3.fc8 requires
Requires: cupsddk = 1.2.0-3.fc8
+ cupsddk-drivers-1.2.0-3.fc8 requires
Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcrypt.so.1
libcups.so.2 libcupsimage.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
libjpeg.so.62 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpng12.so.0 libpthread.so.0
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libtiff.so.3 libz.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH)

+ Not a GUI App.
APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list