[Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libXNVCtrl -  Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248291





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-07-26 12:37 EST -------
Review for release 2.fc6:
* RPM name is OK
* Source nvidia-settings-1.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream
* Builds fine in mock
* INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST
As linking with oyranos work and runtime of oyranos works, 
then run test for the library works... Good!

* running rpmlint on installed files:
[root at Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# rpmlint libXNVCtrl
W: libXNVCtrl incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-2 1.0-2.kwizart.fc6
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XReply
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
XMissingExtension
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XFlush
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XEatData
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
XextRemoveDisplay
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
XextCreateExtension
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XRead
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
_XSetLastRequestRead
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
XextFindDisplay
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0 _XSend
W: libXNVCtrl undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
XextAddDisplay

[root at Kwizatz libXNVCtrl]# ldd /usr/lib64/libXNVCtrl.so.0.0.0
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002aaaaace7000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000555555554000)

I wonder if this can be solved by adding -lX11 (or something else) which seems
needed by BR, i'm searching how to works with thoses issues... where they could
be safety ignored for the review (we need at least to advices upstream about
this...), i wonder if this could be solved by some tweaks ?...


Notes: Thats the only issue it remains (for what i am aware...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.