[Bug 249761] Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: funionfs - Union filesystem in userspace using FUSE


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249761


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-07-27 04:53 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs.
+ source files match upstream.
0cc320624b335a68847c447c9625410b  funionfs-0.4.3.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc files are present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets used.
+ Requires: fuse >= 2.5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libfuse.so.2 libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.2) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.5)
libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6) rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Not a GUI App.
APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.