[Bug 248649] Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: alliance -  Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2007-07-27 07:39 EST -------
* rpmlint on package: (only one of each)
W: alliance devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/alliance/include/msl.h
As taken as a compiler, this is acceptable, the path in acceptable also...
W: alliance devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/alliance/lib/libCtp.so
This one also, as this is not arch dependant...but this may lead to problem later...

But:
E: alliance arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/alliance/lib/libBtr.so.1
.0.3
This one is wrong - This would be better to have them in libdir/alliance (with
the previous symlink as i expect, it will be easier to have them in the same
directory).

Also maybe this is related to our shlib problem we discussed on #IRC: "libtool:
install: warning: `/builddir/build/BUILD/alliance-5.0/abt/src/libAbt.la' has not
been installed in `/usr/share/alliance/lib'"
Does the .la source file exist ?

Here are the output of "rpmlint alliance" on installed files:
This is sometime the result of missing libraries LDFLAGS
(see attachment)


Also i wonder if the  binaries aren't subject to the same problem with generic
names...(i have'nt checked this...)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.