[Bug 226633] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 31 22:33:44 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226633
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |medium
Priority|normal |medium
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-07-31 18:33 EST -------
Abbreviated mass review of xorg-x11-drv-* packages.
5026bdaf644178fee66a26190453b0dddb99558b8c97c4a592a482a2434dc862
xf86-video-via-0.2.2.tar.bz2
rpmlint says:
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0
E: xorg-x11-drv-via library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0
I think these are problematic. Or is there some reason an ldconfig pass isn't
needed here?
W: xorg-x11-drv-via-devel no-documentation
W: xorg-x11-drv-via mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 3)
Not problematic.
Plus 56 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints in /usr/lib64/libviaXvMC.so.1.0.0
and /usr/lib64/libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0.0. I note that the same issues are present
in the XvMC libs from the i810 driver. Maybe there's something special about
XvMC libraries?
* File and directory ownership looks good.
* debuginfo package looks good.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list