[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 6 17:41:05 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-06-06 13:41 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=156374)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=156374&action=view)
mock build log of ppl-0.9-4 on F-devel i386
(I have not read the previous discussion in detail. Just
from having watched the newest spec file...)
Some notes:
* Static archive
- Please explain why you want to include static archives in -devel
package first. Usually this must not be done for several reasons
(maintainance, security, etc) and if you want to ship static archives
(with reasonable reason), split all static archives into different
subpackages.
* macros
- Please use macros. For example, /usr/include should be replaced
with %{_includedir} and perhaps /usr/lib won't be useful for
x86_64 or ppc64 arch.
* Documentation directory
- should usually be %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}
^^^^^^^^^^^^
- and currently /usr/share/doc/ppl/ is not owned by any package.
* defattr
- Currently we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-)
* Mockbuild
- fails on F-devel i386
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list