[Bug 243607] Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 11 17:58:30 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gengetopt - Tool to write command line option parsing code for C programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243607
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |
nThis| |
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-06-11 13:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> > * About %{_datadir}/%{name}
> > - Well, according to the explanation by upstream on the URL
> > above, it may well that all files under %{_datadir}/%{name}
> > be moved into main package and nuke -devel subpackage?
>
> Done. However we may now have to live with some 'rpmlint' warnings from the
> built RPM:
> W: gengetopt devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gengetopt/gnugetopt.h
> W: gengetopt devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gengetopt/getopt.c
> W: gengetopt devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gengetopt/getopt1.c
Judging from the upstream comment, for this package
these messages can be ignored.
> What about this:
> checking for bison... no
> checking for byacc... no
> checking for flex... no
> checking for lex... no
Can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list