[Bug 239428] Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 17 09:25:56 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: slim - Simple Login Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239428
------- Additional Comments From afb at users.sourceforge.net 2007-06-17 05:25 EST -------
(In reply to comment #27)
> > In this case it was simply a matter of a missing "parent directory", in that it
> > only owned the themes directory and not the otherwise empry %{_datadir}/slim...
>
> I don't really understand this comment. slim rightly owns the
> directories...
What I meant was that it was a simple packaging ommision, and nothing regarding
how directories or slashes are treated by RPM. Added the parent, all's well.
> What do you think about my proposal about using Xsession instead
> of xinitrc?
Sounds good. (haven't tried it yet)
> My opinion is that it is right for slim to be in fedora devel
> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide),
> but for stable releases (Fedora 7, Fedora 6) it seems to me that
> we should wait for pam support. As I also said you could also
> go for stable release branches, but in that case a comment
> in README.fedora should state that after login the user won't
> have access to most hardware. Given what flows on the fedora-devel
> list it seems clear to me that many fedora contributors would find
> that having a display manager without pam support in fedora stable
> releases is bad.
Rawhide it is then.
> > ? (at the moment I haven't got a Fedora Account or the build system setup
either)
>
> Do you mean that you aren't sponsored?
> Did you have a look at:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
I think so ? Package is reviewed/approved (Comment #19), so that would probably
be next ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list