[Bug 243631] Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jun 23 09:43:15 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2007-06-23 05:43 EST -------
Looking at mutt, it seems logical to requires /usr/sbin/sendmail
since it is what is used in the default case. So using alternatives
seems to me the only way to fill the provides for mutt. So here is
what I propose (for esmtp, msmtp and ssmtp):

* use alternatives, but only for what is truely provided. So
  no mailq, no newaliases in the alternatives system, only 
  /usr/sbin/sendmail
* use a lower value for priority than real mta. Real mta are
  at 30, so maybe use 20.
* don't provide mta or MTA: nothing use it in fedora, and it is
  ambiguous (what is a MTA? Something that sends mail, or also receive
  and deliver locally)?
* don't provide smtpdaemon, this means that a smtp daemon is listening 
  on 127.0.0.1, and neither of these packages provide that.

For information:

$ repoquery --whatrequires MTA mta
(nothing)
$ repoquery --whatprovides mta
(nothing)
$ repoquery --whatprovides MTA
postfix-2:2.4.3-3.fc8.i386
sendmail-0:8.14.1-2.i386
exim-0:4.66-3.fc7.i386
ssmtp-0:2.61-11.1.fc7.i386

$ repoquery --whatprovides smtpdaemon
postfix-2:2.4.3-3.fc8.i386
sendmail-0:8.14.1-2.i386
exim-0:4.66-3.fc7.i386
ssmtp-0:2.61-11.1.fc7.i386
$ repoquery --whatrequires smtpdaemon
mlmmj-0:1.2.14-2.fc7.i386
bugzilla-0:3.0-3.fc7.noarch
amavisd-new-0:2.4.5-1.fc7.noarch
fetchmail-0:6.3.7-1.fc7.i386


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list