[Bug 219025] Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ntop - A network traffic probe similar to the UNIX top command
Alias: ntop

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219025





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-06-27 19:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #108)
> This is for upstream, but there are still the undefined-non-weak-symbol
> certainly those I found above.
> W: ntop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libntop-3.3.so static_ntop
> ....
> W: ntop undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libntopreport-3.3.so static_ntop

Yeah, I'd already reported this and a bunch more previous to upstream, but they
didn't fix this.  Not sure if they will.

> The timestamps are not kept. Maybe adding 
> INSTALL='install -p' to the make install command line would
> do the trick.

Will do.

> I see a blocker:
> W: ntop service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ntop

Appears that rpmlint now checks the LSB entries as well! Fixed.

> --skip-version-check yes

I fixed this in the init file when upstream changed it but forgot the config
file :)  Fixed.

> So it seems to me that the directory /var/lib/ntop/interfaces/
> should preexist.

It looks like upstream has changed something here.  The correct location should
be /var/lib/ntop/rrd/interfaces/throughput.rrd, but looking through the code, it
appears that when throughput.rrd is created, the variable that hold rrd
directory may be uninitialized.  I'll be checking this with upstream.

I'll be out of town until next week.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.