[Bug 246302] Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 29 22:41:16 UTC 2007

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sub2srt - Convert files in .sub format to .srt


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2007-06-29 18:41 EST -------
There's no reason for the explicit dependency on perl; rpm finds that on its
own.  I don't think it's a blocker, though, merely redundant.

* source files match upstream:
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   sub2srt = 0.5.3-1.fc8
?  perl (unnecessary)

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  It does run OK, though I have 
   no files to test it with.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

More information about the package-review mailing list