[Bug 230512] Review Request: viewvc- Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: viewvc-  Browser interface for CVS and SVN version control repositories


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230512





------- Additional Comments From bjohnson at symetrix.com  2007-03-01 14:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Actually, now that I look at the -2 version of the spec file, it seems to me
> that I may have misunderstood the %{python_sitelib} usage on the Packaging
> Python page. This directory holds pure python stuff, right? It's not meant as a
> replacement for /usr/share/packagename (i.e. architecture independent files)? Or
> is it?

You will see packaging done in both places.  Certainly "module" type packages
will live in the sitelib (like the subversion bindings).  I believe that for
applications like this is is more a matter of taste.

I'm no python expert (or packing expert), but I just recently finished TMDA
package that lives in sitelib.

Some people believe that /usr/share is strictly for arch independent data files
(not program).

And just as an example:
MoinMoin (web wiki) : sitelib
Yum                 : %{datadir}

Your packages templates should definately live in %{datadir} though.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.