[Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 7 04:21:29 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmapfont - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560





------- Additional Comments From fangqq at gmail.com  2007-03-06 23:21 EST -------
thank you Ingvar

I made the following changes based on your feedback:

1. add URL tag
2. remove obsolete requirement
3. add chkfontpath as dependence
4. remove the mixed tab and space on line 59
5. modify the changelog version tag to version-release format
6. the source wqy-bitmapfont-pcf-0.8.0-6.tar.gz is uploaded to the suggested url

I also compile the rpm file in the way you suggested, and modify the permission
of the spec file. The new spec and srpm files can be downloaded from the
original urls.

I guess I have to things to complete at this point: 1. find a sponsor, I will
read the web page you pointed out, and go through the steps. 2. to determine
whether to keep or remove the "aggressive" commands in the spec. I used cp/rm
commands in order to make the rpm file compatible to the older versions of X
window and fontconfig, and make it usable for older versions of redhat or
redhat-based systems. Particularly, fontconfig has changes from 2.1.x to 2.3.x
and to 2.4.x. For these older versions, I need to make sure the font setting
file is copied to the right directory. I think this needs suggestions from the
sponsor.

I compiled this rpm on my CentOS4.4, a redhat based distribution, I will install
a FC6 soon if I find time, but before that, if you can kindly give a quick test
on the new rpm file, I would be greatly appreciated.

again, thank you very much for your help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list