[Bug 194280] Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 7 19:57:23 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: kdebindings: KDE/DCOP bindings to non-C++ languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194280
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2007-03-07 14:57 EST -------
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
1. The dcopperl subpackage, you need to move the
BuildRequires: perl
above the description. Right now that shows up in the description.
Since perl is in the min build root, do we need this?
(Although I think it's currently only there due to rpm-build needing it)
2. rpmlint says:
a)
E: kdebindings non-executable-script /usr/share/apps/kjsembed/cmdline.js 0644
Should this be 755? Not sure if there is any need for javascript to be exectable tho
b)
E: kdebindings hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2
Remove prefix here?
c)
W: kdebindings mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 69, tab: line 5)
Minor nit, fix if you like.
d)
W: kdebindings patch-not-applied Patch140302: kdebindings-3.5.6-kde#140302.patch
Drop patch if it's not applied?
e)
E: kdebindings-dcopperl non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/DCOP/DCOP.so 0555
Should be 755?
f)
W: kdebindings-devel no-documentation
ignore.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list