[Bug 231486] New: Review Request: mecab-ipadic - IPA dictorionary for MeCab

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231486

           Summary: Review Request: mecab-ipadic - IPA dictorionary for
                    MeCab
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mecab-ipadic.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mecab-ipadic-2.7.0.20060707-1.fc7.src.rpm
Mockbuild log on FC-devel i386: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/LOGS/MOCK-mecab-ipadic.log

Description:
MeCab IPA is a dictionary for MeCab using CRF estimation
based on IPA corpus.

NOTE:
This package is very similar with mecab-jumandic
(bug 229929 : already imported)

rpmlint on binary rpm:
-----------------------------------------------------
W: mecab-ipadic invalid-license MIT-ish (See LICENSE.*)
E: mecab-ipadic no-binary
E: mecab-ipadic only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
W: mecab-ipadic-EUCJP invalid-license MIT-ish (See LICENSE.*)
E: mecab-ipadic-EUCJP only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
------------------------------------------------------
* For license: see LICENSE.Fedora
* no executable binaries are installed, but the
  installed data is compiled by arch-dependent binaries
  (in mecab: bug 229927, already imported) and the 
  created data are arch-dependent.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.