[Bug 229930] Review Request: thunar-volman - Automatic management of removable drives and media for the Thunar file manager

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Mar 10 23:40:40 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: thunar-volman - Automatic management of removable drives and media for the Thunar file manager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229930





------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de  2007-03-10 18:40 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Sorry it took so long for me to chime in on this one... 

Never mind, I'm not in a hurry since I'm very busy @ work. Sorry.

> 1. I don't think I care much. Sticking with the upstream name has some value
> however (ie, people reading upstream docs will look for that package name, etc),

I would fix that with a Provides: thunar-volman as I'm doing for all my packages
that have a different name from upstream.

> so I think it's marginally better to stick with thunar-volman. 

+1

> 2. Is thunar-volman useful in any way by itself or to other programs? 

You can call thunar-volman from the command line (syntax is just like exo-mount,
exo-unmount or exo-eject) but it's not really useful for every day work. I'm
afraid it needs to be in bindir due to upstream approach to write programs that
look for these helpers in $PATH.

> Have you had a chance to bring this up to upstream? 

Not yet.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list