[Bug 222597] Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Mar 11 18:12:08 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP - Class to generate CHAP packets
Alias: pear-Crypt-CHAP

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222597


Fedora at FamilleCollet.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From Fedora at FamilleCollet.com  2007-03-11 14:11 EST -------
=== REVIEW ===

:) source files match upstream:
b09ba7b851f85528638d9a9dae67b1c9  Crypt_CHAP-1.0.0.tgz
:) package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
:) specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
:) dist tag is present.
:) build root is correct (second form).
:) license field matches the actual license.
:) license is open source-compatible (BSD).
:) latest version is being packaged (1.0.0)
:) BuildRequires are proper.
:) %clean is present.
:) package builds in mock (FC6).
:) package installs properly
:/ rpmlint output acceptable
W: php-pear-Crypt-CHAP no-documentation
:) final provides are sane:
php-pear(Crypt_CHAP) = 1.0.0
php-pear-Crypt-CHAP = 1.0.0-1.fc7
:) final Requires are sane:
php-mcrypt  
php-mhash  
php-pear(PEAR)  
:) %check is not present; 
:) owns the directories it creates
:) no duplicates in %files.
:) file permissions are appropriate.
:) scriplets are ok (pear install)
:) code, not content.
:/ no documentation.

=== APPROVED ===


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list