[Bug 208034] Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Mar 12 08:08:34 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: HippoDraw - Interactive and Python scriptable data analysis application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208034
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-03-12 04:08 EST -------
Well, as I said my comment
--------------------------------------
qt-devel is needed for HippoDraw-devel
--------------------------------------
is a just a example. Would you check all dependency for -devel
package again?
And. I have a question.
Well, /usr/include/HippoDraw/numarray/num_util.h contains:
--------------------------------------
10 // $Id: num_util.h,v 1.11 2007/02/13 19:15:14 pfkeb Exp $
11 //
12
13 #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
14 #include "config.h"
15 #endif
16
17 #include <boost/python.hpp>
18 #ifdef HAVE_NUMPY
19 #include <numpy/noprefix.h>
20 #else
21 #ifdef HAVE_NUMERIC
22 #include <Numeric/arrayobject.h>
23 #else
24 #include <numarray/arrayobject.h>
25 typedef int intp;
26 #endif
27 #endif
28
--------------------------------------
(well, the line 17 implies that HippoDraw-devel needs
"Requires: boost-devel")
Here the files included by this file differs according to
what is "define"d, however, how can I know if HAVE_NUMPY or
so should be defined when using this header file?
Well, at the stage of compiling HippoDraw, it was determined
whether HAVE_NUMPY or so was defined or not because "config.h"
is included. Perhaps when I use this header file, it should
be consistent with the stage of compiling HippoDraw about
whether I should define HAVE_NUMPY or not, isn't it?
Or can this be ignored?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list