[Bug 227105] Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227105


pcheung at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|pcheung at redhat.com          |dbhole at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From pcheung at redhat.com  2007-03-12 10:10 EST -------
* verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-
plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.noarch.rpm
plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
plexus-runtime-builder-javadoc-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.noarch.rpm
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.noarch.rpm
config(plexus-runtime-builder) = 0:1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7
plexus-runtime-builder = 0:1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.noarch.rpm
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(plexus-runtime-builder) = 0:1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7
jakarta-commons-codec
jakarta-commons-httpclient
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.7.2
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.7.2
maven-wagon
maven2-common-poms >= 1.0
plexus-appserver
plexus-archiver
plexus-container-default
plexus-utils
plexus-velocity
plexus-xmlrpc
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
velocity
xmlrpc
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
jpackage-utils >= 0:1.7.2
jakarta-commons-codec
jakarta-commons-httpclient
maven2 >= 2.0.4
maven2-plugin-compiler
maven2-plugin-install
maven2-plugin-jar
maven2-plugin-javadoc
maven2-plugin-release
maven2-plugin-resources
maven2-plugin-surefire
maven2-common-poms >= 1.0
maven-wagon
plexus-appserver
plexus-archiver
plexus-container-default
plexus-utils
plexus-velocity
plexus-xmlrpc
velocity
xmlrpc
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.src.rpm
(none)[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --provides
/var/lib/mock/fedora-develox86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-javadoc-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.noarch.rpm
plexus-runtime-builder-javadoc = 0:1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpm -qp --requires
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-javadoc-1.0-0.1.a9.2jpp.1.fc7.noarch.rpm
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1

* run rpmlint on the binary RPMs built in mock:
[pcheung at to-fcjpp1 review]$ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-jpp17-pcheung/result/plexus-runtime-builder-*rpm
W: plexus-runtime-builder non-standard-group Development/Java
W: plexus-runtime-builder no-documentation
W: plexus-runtime-builder non-standard-group Development/Java
W: plexus-runtime-builder-javadoc non-standard-group Development/Documentation
E: plexus-runtime-builder-javadoc zero-length
/usr/share/javadoc/plexus-runtime-builder-1.0/package-list

Please fix the error, and while you're fixing that, could you please also 
get rid of the %define gcj_support 0 and %define _with_gcj_support to 1?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.