[Bug 227198] Review Request: jpgalleg - JPEG library for the Allegro game library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jpgalleg - JPEG library for the Allegro game library
Alias: jpgalleg

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227198


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2007-03-13 16:48 EST -------
==== REVIEW GUIDELINES ====
- rpmlint output:
W: jpgalleg-devel no-documentation
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5 _i_cx_r
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5 _i_cx_w
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5 _i_get_cpuid_info
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5 _i_is_486
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5
_i_is_cpuid_supported
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5 _i_is_cyrix
W: jpgalleg undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libjpgal.so.2.5 _i_is_fpu

Okay, see comment #5

- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license field matches actual license
- license text included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec legible
- sources match upstream 4bdd12fc3c1afb06f4ec23b4cb200559
- successfully compiles and builds on FC-6 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- ldconfig called in %post/un sections
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- directories it does not owned belong to filesystem
- no duplicates in %files
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean
- macro usage is consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- header files located in devel subpackage
- no static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- .so file in devel subpackage
- devel have fully versioned dependency
- no libtool archive files
- not a GUI application
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages

*** APPROVED ***


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.