[Bug 225791] Merge Review: gettext

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 15 03:27:47 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: gettext


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225791





------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2007-03-14 23:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
>     * The most simple way is just to "rm -f"

ok

> W: gettext unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/preloadable_libintl.so
|
>    - For the first one (unstripped-binary-or-object), rpmbuild
>      doesn't strip libraries when libraries does not have
>      executable permissions when %install stage is done
>      (adding %attr does not make sense for stripping)
> 
>      To strip this, the permission of preloadable_libintl.so
>      has to be changed explicitly to 0755.

fixing

> E: gettext no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/preloadable_libintl.so
|
>    - I don't know well about preloadable_libintl.so, however
>      can the second rpmlint error (about ldconfig symlink)
>      ignored?

The explanation reads:

'''The package should not only include the shared library itself, but
also the symbolic link which ldconfig would produce. (This is
necessary, so that the link gets removed by rpm automatically when
the package gets removed, even if for some reason ldconfig would not be
run at package postinstall phase.)'''

There is no symlink for preloadable_libintl.so since it is not versioned,
so I think it can be ignored.

> E: gettext-devel zero-length
> /usr/share/doc/gettext-devel-0.16.1/javadoc2/package-list
|
>    - What is the file "package-list"?

I don't know - I can try to find out.

> W: gettext-devel unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libasprintf.so.0.0.0
> /lib/libm.so.6

This seems to be due to the libtool in gettext-runtime/libasprintf/.
Not sure if it is worth fixing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list