[Bug 225633] Merge Review: bzip2
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 15 14:10:40 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: bzip2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225633
varekova at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
Flag|needinfo? |
------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2007-03-15 10:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Seems almost right to me, still 2 issues and some suggestions:
>
> * remove 'static library' from the -devel package description
> since there is no static library
The static library was put back becouse of rpm package need it so - the
description should remain too.
> * the original soname don't follow the usual convention of a soname
> number with an integer, but I am not certain that it is right to
> modify it in fedora. It should better be changed upstream. What is
> the reasoning behind this change?
It is the upstream resolution so fedora should accept it
> * remove the / between $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and macros, like %{_mandir},
> %{_libdir}... since they allready have a leading /
fixed
> * for %patch6, maybe it could be
> %patch6 -p1 -b .bzip2recover
changed
> A remark:
>
> * I completely agree with the new organization of the spec with build in
> %build and install in %install, I would have asked for that the next round
> anyway ;-)
the last version is bzip2-1.0.4-8.fc7.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list