[Bug 227646] Review Request: grass - GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System)

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: grass -  GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227646





------- Additional Comments From cbalint at redhat.com  2007-03-18 08:52 EST -------
(In reply to comment #39)
> Well, for -12:
> 
> * Again check the license:
>   * ./lib/form/license.term
>     - What does the following paragraph mean?
> ------------------------------------------------------
> RESTRICTED RIGHTS: Use, duplication or disclosure by the government
> is subject to the restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c) (1) (ii)
> of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software Clause as DFARS
> 252.227-7013 and FAR 52.227-19.

Hmm, dunno. Indeed in same file thay make clear statement thats public domain,
dont know why they instert restricts for governmental use ?!

> ------------------------------------------------------
>        This term is related to the files under ./visualization/nviz/
> ------------------------------------------------------
>  * See the file "license.terms" for information on usage and redistribution
>  * of this file, and for a DISCLAIMER OF ALL WARRANTIES.
> ------------------------------------------------------

 
>   * Files under ./raster/r.out.mpeg/
>     - Are these related to
>       http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 ?

   Its just a wrapper, i think its safe.
   It calls external cli tools like pnmtompeg from netpnm:
http://netpbm.sourceforge.net/doc/index.html

   Indeed, fedora netpnm does not contain the mpeg parts :-)
  
>   * Files under ./raster/r.terraflow/
>     - It seems that these are licensed under _old_ BSD (i.e.
>       with advertising clause).

> ------------------------------------------------------
>  * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
>  *    must display the following acknowledgement:
>  *      This product includes software developed by Duke University
> ------------------------------------------------------

   Duke developed many software, thay just want to promote themself by asking
in cases of expos or whatever publications to mention their names.
Is it completely unacceptable ?
 
> * Compilation flags
>   - "-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" is passed.

oh .. i go fix it again.

> ------------------------------------------------------
> make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/grass-6.2.1/lib/datetime'
> 
gcc -I/builddir/build/BUILD/grass-6.2.1/dist.i686-redhat-linux-gnu/include  -O2
> -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables    -fPIC    -DPACKAGE=\""grasslibs"\"    
> -DPACKAGE=\""grasslibs"\" 
> -I/builddir/build/BUILD/grass-6.2.1/dist.i686-redhat-linux-gnu/include \
>                 -o OBJ.i686-redhat-linux-gnu/between.o -c between.c
> ------------------------------------------------------



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.