[Bug 222042] Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: GDAL - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222042





------- Additional Comments From valent.turkovic at gmail.com  2007-03-19 04:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #75)
> (In reply to comment #71)
> > and now for the spell checked version :)
> > 
> > As I see gdal-1.4 will be soon available in Fedora Core 6 and Fedora 7.
> > Will you please make gpsdrive available as soon as possible because gdal is 
> the  main dependency for gpsdrive.
> 
>   Well, i personaly not. Already maintain ogdi/gdal/ and soon grass.
> already got a list of infinite problemes with these, and the correct and 
right 
> thing is to help olso upstream, so i think another gpsdrive (wich looks 
pretty 
> biggy) would be an overload, and i dont know how that tool work in fact.

Thank you for your time and the will for maintaining these packages.

>    Valent, why you dont try to go through submission proccess ? if you
> really want that tool in -extra, maybe you can help us with that !
>    The tool indeed looks great, so just a maintainer for -extras is needed :-)

You really don't wan't me maintaining anything :)
I don't have the skills necessary for it. I'm a middle ground linux user/admin.
But I can go to all formal channels and bug other people in fedora community to 
pick it up and do start mainaining it.

So when will gdal be ready for including in fedora 6 extra of fedora 7 
repositories?

>   BTW, as start, read please the gdal -fedora comment form docs inside the 
> package and keep in mind is a bit stripped version of upstream gdal, due
> to license problems.
> 
> > 
> > Thank you.

Thank you!



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.