[Bug 226535] Merge Review: w3m
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 27 05:17:48 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: w3m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226535
------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2007-03-27 01:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Created an attachment (id=150834)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150834&action=view) [edit] [edit] [edit]
> > > w3m.spec with some fixes (0.5.1-18)
> > >
> > > Well, for 0.5.1-17.fc7:
> > >
> > > * Source0
> > > - Please check:
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
> > > (A) It seems that newest gc is 6.8.
> > >
> > > * CFlags
> > > (Please see the attached mock build log)
> > > - Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed
> > > (for gc.a).
> > > For gc.a, it seems okay when ABI_FLAG is set as
> > > RPM_OPT_FLAGS
> > > And.. actually this changes debuginfo contents.
> > Agree.
> >
> > > (B) NOTE:
> > > Usually gc should be seperated from this package (w3m)
> > > and other packages for gc should be created.
> > > In this case, gc package should provide shared library
> > > (not static archive).
> > > However is this too late for F7?
> > Don't think so. Yes static library should be removed.
>
> What I meant here is
> * can you split gc tarball from w3m srpm, create gc package
> (with providing gc shared library)
> from gc tarball and have w3m use gc package before F7?
> * would you upgrade gc to the newest version?
>
>
> > > (D) Question:
> > > - Should all the documents in doc-jp/ files should be
> > > converted from EUC-JP to UTF-8?
> > > I think so, however, if you want to do so, please keep
> > > timestamps on these files even after encodings are converted,
> > > as these documents are 3-6 years old.
> >
> > Agree.
>
> "Agree" means that you will change Japanese documents to
> UTF-8 with timestamps kept as original?
>
> Will do that.
recently I got to maintain this package and have no idea at all about its
packaging. So will take some time with this review to understand its packaging.
Thanks for your comments.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list