[Bug 226535] Merge Review: w3m

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 27 05:17:48 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: w3m


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226535





------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com  2007-03-27 01:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Created an attachment (id=150834)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=150834&action=view) [edit] [edit] [edit]
> > > w3m.spec with some fixes (0.5.1-18)
> > > 
> > > Well, for 0.5.1-17.fc7:
> > > 
> > > * Source0
> > >   - Please check:
> > >     http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
> > > (A) It seems that newest gc is 6.8.
> > > 
> > > * CFlags
> > >     (Please see the attached mock build log)
> > >   - Fedora specific compilation flags are not passed
> > >     (for gc.a).
> > >     For gc.a, it seems okay when ABI_FLAG is set as
> > >     RPM_OPT_FLAGS
> > >     And.. actually this changes debuginfo contents.
> >      Agree.
> > 
> > > (B) NOTE:
> > >     Usually gc should be seperated from this package (w3m)
> > >     and other packages for gc should be created.
> > >     In this case, gc package should provide shared library
> > >     (not static archive). 
> > >     However is this too late for F7?
> >       Don't think so. Yes static library should be removed.
> 
> What I meant here is
> * can you split gc tarball from w3m srpm, create gc package
>   (with providing gc shared library)
>   from gc tarball and have w3m use gc package before F7?
> * would you upgrade gc to the newest version?
> 
> 
> > > (D) Question:
> > >     - Should all the documents in doc-jp/ files should be
> > >       converted from EUC-JP to UTF-8?
> > >       I think so, however, if you want to do so, please keep
> > >       timestamps on these files even after encodings are converted,
> > >       as these documents are 3-6 years old.
> > 
> >         Agree.
> 
> "Agree" means that you will change Japanese documents to
> UTF-8 with timestamps kept as original?
> 
> Will do that.
 
recently I got to maintain this package and have no idea at all about its
packaging. So will take some time with this review to understand its packaging.

Thanks for your comments.




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list