[Bug 212974] Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 27 07:31:00 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |medium
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-03-27 03:30 EST -------
rpmlint reported following output on SRPM and RPM
E: aspell-ar no-binary
The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain
any binaries.
==> Ok for aspell packages
E: aspell-ar only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
==> Ok for aspell packages
W: aspell-ar rpm-buildroot-usage %build DEST_DIR = $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it
will break short circuiting.
W: aspell-ar rpm-buildroot-usage %build dictdir =
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/aspell-0.60
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it
will break short circuiting.
W: aspell-ar rpm-buildroot-usage %build datadir =
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/aspell-0.60
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it
will break short circuiting.
E: aspell-ar no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the
beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list