[Bug 233844] Review Request: perl-Convert-Binary-C - Binary data conversion using C types

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 29 09:10:34 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-Binary-C - Binary data conversion using C types


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233844


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2007-03-29 05:10 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
d65ad3585adaa0a3a1267e25aebc8b37  Convert-Binary-C-0.67.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test
Files=58L_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl
tests/001_init............ok
tests/101_basic...........ok
tests/201_config..........ok
        1/2070 skipped: no debugging
tests/202_misc............ok
tests/203_warnings........ok
tests/204_enum............ok
tests/205_pack............ok
tests/206_parse...........ok
        42/116 skipped: no debugging
tests/207_typedef.........ok
tests/208_float...........ok
tests/209_sourcify........ok
tests/210_depend..........ok
tests/211_clone...........ok
tests/212_clean...........ok
tests/213_string..........ok
tests/214_cache...........ok
tests/215_local...........ok
tests/216_language........ok
tests/217_preproc.........ok
tests/218_member..........ok
tests/219_def.............ok
tests/220_new.............ok
tests/221_asm.............ok
tests/222_ieee............ok
tests/223_initializer.....ok
tests/224_typeof..........ok
tests/225_magic...........ok
tests/226_indexed.........ok
        33/45 skipped: member ordering requires indexed hashes
tests/227_flexarray.......ok
tests/228_hooks...........ok
tests/229_substr..........ok
tests/230_compiler........ok
tests/231_align...........ok
tests/232_native..........ok
tests/233_tags............ok
tests/234_format..........ok
tests/235_basic...........ok
tests/236_typeinfo........ok
tests/237_parser..........ok
tests/238_byteorder.......ok
tests/239_macros..........ok
tests/240_offsetof........ok
tests/241_sizeof..........ok
tests/242_dimension.......ok
tests/243_parser..........ok
tests/501_bfsimple........ok
tests/502_bfmicrosoft.....ok
tests/503_bfgeneric.......ok
tests/601_speed...........ok
tests/602_threads.........ok
tests/603_complex.........ok
        80/6080 skipped: no debugging
tests/701_debug...........ok
tests/702_env.............ok
tests/703_bugs............ok
tests/801_examples........ok
tests/802_pod.............ok
tests/803_pod_coverage....ok
tests/901_memory..........ok
        396/397 skipped: no debugging
All tests successful, 552 subtests skipped.
Files=58, Tests=50334, 85 wallclock secs (60.17 cusr +  1.83 csys = 62.00 CPU)
+ Provides: C.so perl(Convert::Binary::C) = 0.67
perl(Convert::Binary::C::Cached) = 0.67

APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list