[Bug 235804] Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804


j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl




------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2007-05-02 15:00 EST -------
Please update this to be inline with the proposed ocaml guidelines I've just
CC-ed you on. This should fix the ocaml naming policy warning.

Notice that I expect the main discussion on this proposal to happen on on
fedora-devel-list which you can join now. Also you can be added to
fedora-maintainers-list before being sponsored, just ask on the devel list.

Last please remove the -static provides, I think this is bogus for caml as this
are not ordinary static libs. Also the guidelines proposal I just send should
explain how / and why freetennis will not require camlSDL / camlimages and why
this is not a problem.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.