[Bug 235805] Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri May 4 05:52:31 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlimages - OCaml image processing library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805


dev at nigelj.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: camlimages -|Review Request: ocaml-
                   |OCaml image processing      |camlimages - OCaml image
                   |library                     |processing library




------- Additional Comments From dev at nigelj.com  2007-05-04 01:52 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > MUST:
> > =====
> > 0 rpmlint output is:
> > W: camlimages ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied
> > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/dllci_freetype.so
> > W: camlimages-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied
> > /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/Makefile.config
> Ignorable (it actually doesn't happen on a F7 box)
> > MUST FIX
> > ========
> > * rename to ocaml-images or ocaml-camlimages (will fix rpmlint warning, and the
> >   latter is consistent with PLD)
> I tend to disagree, but I'm going to hold off uploading an updated spec, so I
> can make a better judgement.
Okay, I've decided to change... ocaml-camlimages it is.

Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-camlimages.spec
SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/ocaml-camlimages-2.2.0-7.src.rpm

* Fri May 04 2007 Nigel Jones <dev at nigelj.com> 2.2.0-7
- Change to Makefile patch to move .so files to stublibs
- Rename to ocaml-camlimages
- Other changes per review

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list