[Bug 239184] New: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 5 19:19:55 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184

           Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394
                    based cameras
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: 
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras

rpmlint is silent enought on binaries and sources...

As this spec files was taken from atrpms version.
I will request Axel some advices about replacement policy for this package
and his packaging scheme...

For example, what is the aim for : %lib_package dc1394_control 13 ?
Whereas libs are :
[root at Kwizatz lib64]# ls -al
total 84
drwxr-xr-x 2 builder builder  4096 mai  5 21:02 .
drwxr-xr-x 8 builder builder  4096 mai  5 21:02 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder    27 mai  5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder    27 mai  5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12 -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 builder builder 73168 mai  5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1

I was working on libdc1394(-1) before seen -2 from Matthias 
i would like to work with him in case we choose to provides a -2 version...

See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239043

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list