[Bug 226577] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 6 03:24:54 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-apm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226577
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |medium
Priority|normal |medium
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2007-05-05 23:24 EST -------
Well, this the first driver (alphabetically) which will build on x86_64, so I
figured I'd take a look.
A cursory inspection only turns up two issues:
W: xorg-x11-drv-apm invalid-license MIT/X11
which is kind of an odd way to state it, but I guess it's not incorrect.
The other issue is ownership of /usr/lib64/xorg/modules and
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers. I thought there was a discussion at Fudcon
about this between you and spot, but I paid only enough attention to look out
for airborne furniture.
Minor stuff:
%define cvsdate xxxxxxx
Not used in this spec, and aren't these things in git anyway?
Jesse stuck in a weird changelog line:
* Wed Jul 12 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> - sh: line 0: fg: no job
control
Looks like a script took a bit of a dump there.
Umm, I guess that's about it. Needless to say, I have absolutely no way to test
this; I'm not even sure what "apm" means in the context of video.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list