[Bug 239785] Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rott - Rise of the Triad


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239785





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2007-05-16 13:31 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> And... I have to ask this question: do you think we should ask for spot's (or
> even FESCo's) view on the -registered package? I'm leaning towards "no, let's
> finish the review", but I don't want to step on any toes...

Spot makes decisions on licensing, there is no licensing issue here (the code is
100% GPL, the data isn't shipped) as for FESco, I don't think its necessary for
them to get involved either. The package as a whole is ok, that we agree on. The
-registered sub package is just a special compiled version. I could take all the
ifdef's and change it to a runtime variable, with a cmdline switch like it is
already for example for doom (prboom), would I then need to back out the runtime
registered support too? Should we remove doom registered support from prboom?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.