[Bug 239812] Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nagi - An interpreter for AGI games


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239812





------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2007-05-17 07:31 EST -------
Forgot links to new SRPM, Spec.  But, rpmlint gives:
W: nagi invalid-license X11
The value of the License tag was not recognized.  Known values are:
"Academic Free License", "Adaptive Public License", "Apache License", "Apache
Software License", "Apple Public Source License", "Artistic", "Attribution
Assurance License", "BSD", "Computer Associates Trusted Open Source License",
"CDDL", "CPL", "CUA Office Public License", "EU DataGrid Software License",
"Eclipse Public License", "Educational Community License", "Eiffel Forum
License", "Entessa Public License", "Fair License", "Frameworx License",
"GPL", "LGPL", "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer", "IBM Public
License", "Intel Open Source License", "Jabber Open Source License", "Lucent
Public License", "MIT", "CVW License", "Motosoto License", "MPL", "NASA Open
Source Agreement", "Naumen Public License", "Nethack General Public License",
"Nokia Open Source License", "OCLC Research Public License", "Open Group Test
Suite License", "Open Software License", "PHP License", "Python license",
"Python Software Foundation License", "QPL", "RealNetworks Public Source
License", "Reciprocal Public License", "Ricoh Source Code Public License",
"Sleepycat License", "Sun Industry Standards Source License", "Sun Public
License", "Sybase Open Watcom Public License", "University of Illinois/NCSA
Open Source License", "Vovida Software License", "W3C License", "wxWindows
Library License", "X.Net License", "Zope Public License", "zlib/libpng
License", "Creative Commons Attribution", "Creative Commons Attribution-
NoDerivs", "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs", "Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial", "Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike", "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike", "Design
Public License", "GFDL", "LaTeX Project Public License", "OpenContent
License", "Open Publication License", "Public Domain", "Ruby License", "SIL
Open Font License", "Charityware", "Commercial", "Distributable", "Freeware",
"Non-distributable", "Proprietary", "Shareware", "Redistributable, no
modification permitted".
If the license is close to an existing one, you can use '<license> style'.

Which one should I use?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.