[Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 21 11:12:31 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422


gnome at dux-linux.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(gnome at dux-        |
                   |linux.org)                  |




------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org  2007-05-21 07:12 EST -------
[@laptop FEDORA]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mrxvt-05b-1.i386.rpm
E: mrxvt description-line-too-long  Mrxvt (previously named materm) is a
lightweight, powerful multi-tabbed terminal emulator for the X window system.
mrxvt is based on rxvt version 2.7.11 CVS and aterm. Mrxvt aims to be fast,
lightweight and independent of standard toolkits or desktop environments (e.g.
Gnome / KDE).
W: mrxvt incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.2-1 05b-1
W: mrxvt unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/mrxvt
W: mrxvt wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrxvt/scripts/mrxvt.vbs
W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr man
W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr etc

The above is the most recent rpmlint output.  I checked out the latest svn
source and built another rpm.  The first two errors are easy to fix.  Since this
is my first "formal" rpm and everyone became interested really quickly after
such a lull... :-)  I will strive to determine how I should fix the remaining
three errors.  Ideas/suggestions are definitely welcome!!!  You can find the
latest rpm build in the attachment above this post.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list