[Bug 223422] Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 22 02:29:04 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mrxvt - Multi-tabbed terminal emulator.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223422





------- Additional Comments From gnome at dux-linux.org  2007-05-21 22:29 EST -------
OK I've tried to implement a few things Jeremy suggested but I'm running into
some issues... 

You can find the latest build, spec file and desktop file here...
http://littlehat.homelinux.org:8000/FEDORA/mrxvt/current/

latest rpmlint...

[@laptop FEDORA]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mrxvt-05b-1.i386.rpm
E: mrxvt description-line-too-long Mrxvt (previously named materm) is based on
rxvt version 2.7.11 CVS and aterm. mrxvt aims to be independent of a user's
desktop environment.
W: mrxvt wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mrxvt/scripts/mrxvt.vbs
W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr man
W: mrxvt non-standard-dir-in-usr etc

I took the latest svn snapshot from sourceforge and built this rpm, but it still
has some problems...  In particular I think the files in /share and /doc need to
be moved around (those are the src tree modifications I alluded to earlier). 
Due to my inexperience with rpm building and the sparse (somewhat unreliable)
info on building them on the fedora wiki, I'm not comfortable recommending these
changes to the maintainer without specific reasons; I've conversed with the
maintainer once and only hinted that the source tree might require changes --
beyond that I've been busy with school and now am on summer break, and ready to
further that discussion with him.  Any ideas? suggestions?  Thanks for the help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the package-review mailing list