[Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri May 25 16:32:19 UTC 2007

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops


tcallawa at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2007-05-25 12:32 EST -------
There is a very minor issue with this package, but it doesn't hold up approval.

- rpmlint says you've got mixed spaces and tabs, look at line 29. 

Fix that item before requesting builds, and we're good. Nice work with the
-devel package.


- rpmlint checks return:

W: R-Matrix mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 29, tab: line 5)
W: R-Matrix-devel no-documentation
E: R-Matrix-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

Safe to ignore the Error (all R packages do that), and the no-docs in -devel.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (Distributable) OK, text in package, matches source (code is a mix of
MIT, GPL, LGPL, documented in spec)
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files 

APPROVED. I'll also sponsor you, thanks for your good work.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

More information about the package-review mailing list