[Bug 225705] Merge Review: docbook-utils

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: docbook-utils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225705





------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com  2007-11-05 08:40 EST -------
I did rpmlint checks on docbook packages in last week, so this is not new for me
and some issues were solved before that review.

About that unknown tag - used virtual provide text-www-browser - which covers
w3m , elinks and lynx , built with koji without troubles, elinks, lynx and w3m
provides that text-www-browser in F8 and devel branch. Documented in virtual
provides of Fedora.

1)About that warning with jw.1.gz - this is packaged in docbook-utils main
package - and that is using it too. There is Requires:docbook-utils={%version}
in subpackage , so is guaranteed, that the symlink will point to correct place.
So I don't care about that warning. I would keep it like that- it is just
cosmetic thing of rpmlint check, because without --nodeps you will not get
situation with symlink pointing to nonexisting file.

That permission 0775 is quiet strange - 0775 is permission of db2html in
tarball, but in %files section I'm using %attr(0755,root,root) on it. In
%install section there is used install -c -m 755 on that file, so it should have
correct 755 permissions after installation.

2-3)Guidelines will be followed.

4)I don't think that the 4th point is not necessary - that last "-" for
directories is by default afaik. But is harmless to add it.

Please let me know if ignoring rpmlint warnings is ok in this case.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.