[Bug 364221] Review Request: ruby-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 7 12:01:45 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ruby-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=364221





------- Additional Comments From pauln at truemesh.com  2007-11-07 07:01 EST -------
rpmlint clean on src.rpm and binary rpm

• Meets Package Naming guidelines
• ruby-mechanize.spec matches package name
• Meets packaging guidelines
• Meets licensing guidelines
• Includes LICENSE.txt
• Spec in american english
• spec legible
• checksums match download.
7805b479a8a36dfa845708fd8a7d9160f283ce3c  SOURCES/mechanize-0.6.10.tgz
7805b479a8a36dfa845708fd8a7d9160f283ce3c  /home/pauln/Download/mechanize-0.6.10.tgz
• compiles noarch
• Builds successfully under mock
• ruby so no locale specific
• no shared libs
• Not relocatable
• Owns all files/dirs
• No duplicate files
• Uses macros fine
• Code package
• No need for seperate -doc
• No -devel, -static, pkgconfig needed
• No devel needed
• Ruby so no libtool
• No .desktop as library
• Cleans out buildroot in %install
• Valid filenames

Packaging Guidelines
• Licensed appropriately (GPL+)
• Not binary/firmware/shareware
• FHS compliant
• Has changelog
• Has compliant buildroot
• cleans out buildroot
• builds under mock - BR good
• Summary and description fine
• ASCII spec, no non-ascii file names
• Includes documentation
• Interpreted ruby so no cflags/debuginfo
• No static libraries
• No rpath, desktop files, libraries
• No scriptlets
• No conditional deps
• Not relocatable
• Owns all files
• Not a web app or kernel module
• No conflicts
• Follows ruby guidelilnes



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list