[Bug 361191] Review Request: rubygem-rails - Web-application framework

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rails - Web-application framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361191





------- Additional Comments From sseago at redhat.com  2007-11-07 11:58 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - License info is accurate
OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
OK - Specfile name
OK - Specfile is legible
OK - No prebuilt binaries included
OK - PreReq not used
OK - Source md5sum matches upstream
OK - No hardcoded pathnames
OK - Package owns all the files it installs
OK - Package requires create needed unowned directories
OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 
OK - BuildRequires sufficient
OK - File permissions set properly (except for rpmlint error below)
OK - Macro usage is consistent

OK - Package is named rubygem-%{gemname}
OK - Source points to full URL of gem
OK - Package version identical with gem version
OK - Package Requires and BuildRequires rubygems
OK - Package provides rubygem(%{gemname}) = %version
OK - Package requires gem dependencies correctly
OK - %prep and %build are empty
OK - %gemdir defined properly, and gem installed into it
OK - Package owns its directories under %gemdir
OK - No arch-specific content in %{gemdir}
OK - Package is noarch

??? - BuildRoot value: not sure if this is really a problem, but it
  looks like %{release} is omitted:

  BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 vs.
             %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

FIX - rpmlint complains 
E: rubygem-rails zero-length
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.2.5/configs/empty.log
E: rubygem-rails zero-length
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-1.2.5/html/favicon.ico


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.