[Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf  -  GConf backend for compizconfig


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021


mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |




------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com  2007-11-11 00:51 EST -------
@ Lars
are you running compiz using glib/gconf or compiz using ccp ? 

by "plugin autoloading" do you mean the option "Automatic plugin sorting" at  
Preferences > Plugin List ??

I tried these:
1. reset'ed my gconf configs @ /apps/compiz
2. loaded compiz using the desktop-effects menu (which runs compiz using glib/gconf)
3. opened ccsm, and switched the backend to gconf
4. enabled some plugins -> result -> compiz segfaults

When I disabled "Automatic plugin sorting",
- enabled manually plugins through the Plugin List -> it works
- however, we lots the ability to select plugins through the main UI, and also
lost the plugin dependency and conflicts check, user had to figure out which to
 enable, which not, and had to sort the plugin loading sequence by themselves.

is that what u meant?

@ Tasaka-san
if this package going to have the dependency to -gnome of compiz-fusion the
compiz packages, some users (though i think the possibility is, rare) might
install only compiz-fusion and not compiz-fusion-extras, 

a little confusion for me here,
should this package pull both compiz-fusion-gnome and compiz-fusion-extras-gnome
?? If i put a dependency like this, both compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-extras
need to be pulled. If I put dependency to only compiz-fusion-gnome, users who
want to use compiz-fusion-extras had to pull the -gnome manually. 

If the first option is selected, if a new package of a different plugins set
appeared in the repo (eg: compiz-fusion-unsupported), should a dependency be
added in this package for the -gnome of the new package??.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.