[Bug 339021] Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf - GConf backend for compizconfig

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: compizconfig-backend-gconf  -  GConf backend for compizconfig


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=339021





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2007-11-11 02:40 EST -------
Well,

(In reply to comment #11)
> @ Tasaka-san
> if this package going to have the dependency to -gnome of compiz-fusion the
> compiz packages, some users (though i think the possibility is, rare) might
> install only compiz-fusion and not compiz-fusion-extras, 
  I will leave it as how you judge.
  If we can install compizconfig-backend-gconf, compiz-fusion-gnome
  only and leave compiz-fusion-extras-gnome uninstalled, then
  this package should not require compiz-fusion-extras-gnome.

  One method is that
  - make compizconfig-backend-gconf require compiz-fusion-gnome only
  - create compizconfig-backend-gconf-extras subpackage with
    containing no files and make compizconfig-backend-gconf-extras
    require both compizconfig-backend-gconf ( =%{version}-%{release} )
    and compiz-fusion-extras-gnome

  ... if I understand what you mean.

> If the first option is selected, if a new package of a different plugins set
> appeared in the repo (eg: compiz-fusion-unsupported), should a dependency be
> added in this package for the -gnome of the new package??.

It depends on what you judge.
If you think that new different plugins should be installed
with compizconfig-backend-gconf by default, the new dependency
should be added.
If you think the new plugins are not needed for this package by
default, new dependency is not needed.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.