[Bug 240500] Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.14.0 - Functions that are needed by many other packages


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240500


alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alexl at users.sourceforge.net




------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net  2007-11-11 20:13 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Based on the R packaging guidelines, there are the new files
> 
> SPEC:
> http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Biobase-1.14/R-Biobase.spec
> SRPM:
>
http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-Biobase-1.14/R-Biobase-1.14.0-3.fc6.src.rpm

The License: tag is wrong, according to
http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.0/bioc/html/Biobase.html it is licensed
under "Artistic 2.0" which is acceptable for Fedora but needs to made explicit:,
see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

Tom, I'd like to get bioconductor into Fedora, if you don't want to review this,
I can pick it up.

Pierre-Yves: are you planning on packaging all of Bioconductor, or only parts of
it?  Is there some kind of tracker bug that would block all the relevant
packages?  Which package should I review (and build) first?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.