[Bug 383281] Review Request: b43legacy-firmware - V3 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 21:36:55 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: b43legacy-firmware - V3 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383281
notting at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2007-11-14 16:36 EST -------
MUST:
- Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
- Spec file matches base package name. - OK
- Spec has consistent macro usage. - OK
- Meets Packaging Guidelines. - ***
*** The 'version' used is odd, and I don't see where it's coming from.
- License - ***
*** If FE-Legal is OK, I suppose it's OK. We're sort of inferring the terms, though.
- License field in spec matches - OK
- License file included in package - OK
- Spec in American English - OK
- Spec is legible. - OK
- Sources match upstream md5sum: ***
*** Link in spec file does not work.
- Package needs ExcludeArch - ***
*** Might need Exclude/ExclusiveArch to match where driver is built. Is this
built on all arches?
- BuildRequires correct - OK
- Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A
- Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
- Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
- Package has correct buildroot - OK
- Package is code or permissible content. - OK
- Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
- Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK
- Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (noarch)
- Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
- Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.- OK
- Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
- No rpmlint output. - OK
- final provides and requires are sane:
SHOULD Items:
- Should build in mock. - OK (tested i386)
- Should build on all supported archs - OK (noarch)
- Should function as described. - didn't test, no hardware
- Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A
- Should have dist tag - N/A
- Should package latest version - ... what is latest?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list