[Bug 226037] Merge Review: libpfm
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Nov 14 22:32:39 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: libpfm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226037
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
pertusus at free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pertusus at free.fr
------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2007-11-14 17:32 EST -------
Is the static lib needed?
libpfm.so should be in -devel.
%{_prefix} should be used instead of PREFIX
The rpm dependency generator doesn't generate rightly the dependencies
certainly because the library file isn't executable. Then the %attr
can be dropped.
The timestamps should be kept.
Using %{PACKAGE_VERSION} is very strange in %files.
The buildroot is not the preferred one.
%doc for mandir is not needed.
Are the following really needed:
ExclusiveOS: linux
AutoReqProv: no
License is not right.
I don't think that libpfm-3.2-rpm_opt.patch is the right way to do.
I think that something like
make CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
is simpler and less intrusive.
I suggest changing %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list